My company is SSE Technologies We are a the term “barcode integrator.” We work in the auto-ID industry. We’re using AI in my business, but the agents I’m talking about are the ones you build yourself. The stock stuff out there, like the applications using Claude code or any of those things, are stock. What I’m talking about is building your own workflows. When you do that, the information it works off is only your own information that you give it. The agents have very small runways to work on, so they really don’t hallucinate much.
You build guardrails around that to bring you in as a human, or to send things back into a loop to be worked on if anything strays from the path of the workflow you’re working on. If you want to talk about it, send me a PM and I’ll get you my telephone number and we can review it. This is not something I’m trying to do for you or sell to you, as I said. It’s really important for you and anyone else who’s listening here to start employing these types of methods, like Dane Studios’ agent framework, for building agentic workflows. It can be very simple. It doesn’t have to be really complex things.
When you do it and go through the process, it’s not garbage in, garbage out. You really get a system that is tracking what it’s doing and learning from it and getting better, and it’s really purpose-built for what you want to do. For example, if someone just gave an example of building load specs, you build a workflow to do that. You don’t ask some agent to do it for you, or ask AI, “Hey, I want to build this and do this for me and do that.” What you do is define what you do in your processes to figure these things out, what data points and real source documentation you use to do this, and then work out a process to enable AI to do it the way it does it best. You design specific agents to do specific tasks that you need to have done, and you have agents that are designed to do specific analysis of the data that comes back and make recommendations. The governing agents that sit above that make sure they meet the guardrails for what success is. Success isn’t the load, for example, that fires at the exact pressure and gives you this speed that you want. It’s the bigger issue: something that is delivering you sub-quarter MOA groups at 200 yards in X, Y, Z conditions. It’s the outcome that you want that is the thing it’s judged against, rather than, “Hey, I have this cartridge that has this spec.” That’s the interesting part about it all. you can build in to this your own calculators with data collection points on your phone so It gives you the test info to use on the range after you develop the load. records all results and applies that to your next round in Load development lets say. all in real time.
more importantly build this into your website sell It as a service for example. have people log in use your phone app, record all of their test data etc. in public or private. when you have 100’s of people using It the RAG behind It all grows and the agents get smarter your work benefits others in helping the system get smarter. Saying necessarily that you’re giving other people your loads or development, but the system that does the load development gets much smarter in all the iterations that it goes through with everybody who’s worked with it. What works, what doesn’t work, etc.
This is just one example, but it will carry over to everything else you do in your business. All the minuscule tasks you have to do in managing the manufacturing of what you build and sell, the SEO you’re describing.
The reality is that SEO is dead. It’s not SEO anymore; it’s GEO. That’s what’s really going to matter. GEO is how you build your sites and your social media and everything that faces out so that it’s found well through searches in, say, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude, because that’s where everybody is doing their searching now. Nobody is really just typing it into a Google screen. They might type it into the Google prompt, but the AI pops up and it’s usually the top thing you read, and then you can interact with it from there, as an example.
If you have any interest to discuss it, I can review some of this with you and point you in the right directions. I would recommend definitely taking a class like the Agent to Agent class that I took with Harvard. It’s two and a half weeks. MIT has one, which I believe is three or four weeks. That’s also very good. Reach out.